Solutions
The same platform, four different jobs
A university spring hackathon, a bank’s recruitment weekend, an accelerator demo day and a ministry programme are not the same event. They need the same machinery and very different answers about scale, judging and where the data lives.
01Universities
A calendar of events, not a scramble each spring
Faculty hackathons, an open annual event, a datathon for one department. Different organisers each time, the same expectations from the administration afterwards.
One workspace, many events
Every faculty event lives in the same place, with its own dates, criteria and roster.
Accreditation-ready reporting
Per-criterion scores exported in a form a faculty submission accepts.
The archive stays
Last year's event is still browsable, with its results intact.
Three languages
Azerbaijani, English and Russian, switchable per user.
What usually goes wrong
- A new spreadsheet and a new group chat every year
- Judging that different faculties score differently
- No archive when accreditation asks what happened
Already run on the platform
- 6
- Events run by one account
- 1,420
- Participants reached
02Corporates
A hiring channel that produces evidence, not impressions
Graduate recruitment, internal innovation sprints, partner challenges. The point is what people did over the weekend, and being able to show it afterwards.
Criteria you can defend
Weight the rubric toward the signals you actually hire on.
Every score attributable
Who scored what, on which criterion, with coverage visible.
Export to your process
Participants, projects and scores out as CSV, into your ATS.
Mentors from your teams
Engineers work a help queue instead of wandering the room.
What usually goes wrong
- Judging notes scattered across a dozen inboxes
- No consistent way to compare candidates across teams
- Nothing to hand HR when the weekend is over
Already run on the platform
- 152
- Participants in one event
- 855
- Scores recorded
03Accelerators
Demo day, with the judging under control
A short build window, a heavy panel, investors in the room who need to see but not touch. The format is different from a student hackathon and the software should not fight it.
Read-only guests
A viewer role for investors and press that changes nothing.
Normalised panels
A judge who scored half the criteria does not distort the ranking.
Presentation scheduling
Order, slots and links, visible to everyone at once.
Results you can publish
Podium and per-criterion breakdown, exportable immediately.
What usually goes wrong
- Investor guests who should read but never edit
- Panels large enough that partial scoring skews the board
- Pitch order decided the night before, on paper
04Public sector
Procurement-ready, and it runs where you say
Ministries and agencies have a process before they have an event. The questions are about data residency, audit and retention, and they come before anyone talks about features.
Your infrastructure
Deployed into your cloud account or onto your servers.
Your database
The data never leaves your tenancy, and the backups are yours.
Answered in writing
Security questionnaire completed, retention terms agreed before signature.
Single sign-on
Members authenticate through your identity provider.
What usually goes wrong
- Participant data that may not leave the country
- A security questionnaire that blocks the timeline
- Retention terms nobody can put in writing
Not sure which one you are?
Most programmes are a mix. Open the walkthrough, look at what the console does, and tell us the shape of your year — the plan follows from that, not the other way round.